June 15, 2003
Lying: A Government Institution
There is an alternative to governmental lying. It is to tell the truth. Or, if need be, to remain silent.
David Wise
I, for one, believed Bill Clinton, when he publically stated he did not have sex with "that woman." And I will not forgive him for lying to ME. When I look back on that TV moment, I can't help but laugh at my staunch defense of him. His ego and his office took in both Hillary and me. I was naïve (she was in denial).
My fellow liberal friends tried to counter my anger by detailing all the good social programs he initiated during his presidency. But I can't forget that one special social program. Presidential lying to the American public is unacceptable.
I have always thought that Watergate was a watershed when it came to the public's trust of government. When someone like my father (a born Democrat who, back then, was morphing into a conservative Republican right before my eyes) started calling, first Nixon, then all politicians "crooks," I knew something had changed.
Nixon, however, was neither the first nor the last to misinform. In today's Washington Post, David Wise (author of The Politics of Lying) gives us a brief history of recent presidential deceit.
Posted by jeff at June 15, 2003 10:25 AM | TrackBackView Most Recent Story | Notify me when there's a new post!
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://wetheblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/33
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lying: A Government Institution:
» texas holdem from texas holdem
In your free time, check out some relevant pages about texas holdem online poker texas hold em [Read More]
Tracked on March 11, 2005 10:12 AM
Comments
What could be worse than lying to the public at the presidential level? Not much, it would seem. However, the systematic exploitation of legal and linguistic ambiguities in order to just barely not lie with extreme intent is far worse in my opinion. An understanding of how far truthfulness can be pushed within the world of media is a dangerous weapon that is its most potent when the lines of demarcation between truthfulness and dishonesty remain static. The only way to counter this threat to the transparency of our government is to act at a cultural level to coninuously shift these borders around so that forces that look to rework the truth are subverted.
Posted by: Wesley Smith at June 15, 2003 04:29 PM
Post a Comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)