November 03, 2003
The War of the Words
Trying to eliminate Saddam...would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible... We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq.... there was no viable "exit strategy" we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land.
George Herbert Walker Bush
From his memoir, A World Transformed (1998)
(via Disinformation)
Friday, Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz spoke at Georgetown University. He also took questions from an audience that questioned his good sense. Melanie M. summarizes the Q & A in War. What is it Good For? (via brushstroke.tv).
Posted by jeff at November 3, 2003 08:23 AM | TrackBackView Most Recent Story | Notify me when there's a new post!
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://wetheblog.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/46
Comments
Post a Comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)